IBS4 system Roulette baccarat

Pas de copyright (# ISBN)

Special techniques have been developed since the very first few versions of IBS. The previous versions of IBS being extremely powerful, they did require a fairly larger bankroll in order to win the runs. IBS4 has been particularly focusing on reducing the amount of bankroll required and still maintain its power.

Moreover, IBS4 comes also with a very strong bet selection, a very particular way of grouping decisions that clusters wins and losses. The ones who are familiar with the previous versions of IBS know that it is important to have a few wins after long sequences of losses in order to complete a run with a profit and this bet selection does exactly that.

This document has been written in a totally independent manner of the previous versions of IBS. Therefore, if you do not possess any previous versions, one can fully understand this document and use IBS4 on its own.

The name Infallible should not be misleading. No system can win every run, particularly when the table goes against every single bet you make. With IBS4, you will win so many runs, that even if you may abandon some with a certain accepted loss, it will be very negligible relative to the huge number of the ones you have won and your profits will exceed your losses by far. And with the quantity of consecutive runs you will win, you will feel you are using a quasi infallible system.

The name also contains a system for Baccarat. However, you should be assured that IBS4 can be used for any game paying even bets, for Reds and Blacks, Highs and Lows, Odds and Evens in Roulette, Player and Banker for Baccarat, Pass Line and Don’t Pass Line in Craps, Big and Small in Sic-Bo and even Casino War.

For the sake of this document, we will refer mostly to Player and Banker decisions in Baccarat.

IBS4’s bet method will work with most bet selections, although this document suggests and recommends a very powerful and particular one. Should you find IBS4’s bet selection too complicated, and would like to use an alternate one, then even placing your bets just on Player, for instance, will produce still extremely good results. Playing Player only already wins about 47% of all bets on the long run, which is a lot more than what IBS4 requires. And you need not worry about commissions. If one wins between 25% to 30% of all bets, one will come out ahead overall with IBS4. And this is not a difficult task.

Over 40,000 Zumma tester book decisions, IBS4’s bet selection generates 12,751 wins over 12,831 losses, almost an equal number of wins versus losses. Over 40,000 random decisions, the number of wins surpasses at times the number of losses by 50-200. So, to use the IBS4’s bet selection with flat bets only will not generate sufficient profits. It will be a very slow process. However, with the way wins and losses are grouped according to the bet selection, IBS4 bet method will excel.

Let’s start by defining this very particular bet selection.

Decisions are grouped in several layers, in order to capture the most common patterns formed by those decisions. Instead of looking for a very large number of patterns, that may be formed within the last 8-12 decisions, IBS4’s bet selection simplifies the process by going through several layers or stages.

We shall first look at the last 4 decisions. We will find that we may have either an equal number of Player versus Banker decisions or we may have only Player or only Banker decisions or an unequal number of Player versus Banker decisions. Those are the only three criteria that can exist within 4 decisions.

Looking at the last case, where there is an unequal number of Player versus Banker decisions, this means, that three out of four decisions are the same, i.e. P P P B or B B B P and one is different. We will name this case “unequal” and designate it with a capital U.

We will merge the other two cases, where there are an equal number of Player versus Banker, that is 2 P’s and 2 B’s (P P B B or B B P P) or where all four decisions are the same, that is, P P P P or B B B B and we will call those cases “equal” and designate them with a capital “E”.

Here is a small example:

We don’t play the first 4 decisions and observe them. The first 4 being all P’s, we call this case E. Then a B comes up at hand 5. Thus the last 4 decisions are now P P P B. This is an unequal case and we designate it as U.

Then a P comes up at hand 6. The last 4 decisions become P P B P. This is also an unequal case, since there are 3 P’s and 1 B. We designate it as U.

Then a B comes up at hand 7. The last 4 decisions are now: P B P B. There is an equal number of P’s versus B’. So this case is E(qual).

Then a B comes up at hand 8. The last 4 decisions are now: B P B B. Three B’s versus one P, an Unequal case.

As you can see, instead of looking at patterns formed within B or P decisions, we will look for patterns formed within E and U cases. You will see that this will allow a more efficient grouping.

If there are successive E’s or U’s, i.e. E E , E E E, U U, U U U, etc. we will call this a streak and designate it with an “S”. Thus, if the last two cases are the same, we will define it as a (S)treak.

If the E’s and U’s alternate, i.e. E U E U…, we will call this a chop and designate it with a “C”. Thus, if the last two cases are different, we will define it as a (C)hop.

Example 2 below will show this new layer.

At hand 4 we have an E and at hand 5 we have a U case. Thus this is a chop and we write a C next to decision 5.

At hand 5 we have a U case and at hand 6 we also have a U case. Thus this is a streak and we write an S next to decision 6.

U turns into E at hand 7, thus this is a chop or C.

E turns into an U at hand 8, thus this is another chop and we write C at hand or decision 8.

After this layer, we look at the last 4 decisions and observe the Streak/Chop column. If in the last 4 decisions, we have an equal number of C’s and S’s, we don’t place a bet and we write “No Bet” on our next column or layer. If we have more C’s than S’s, then we identify the tendency to be a C and we bet accordingly. If we have more S’s than C’, that is, either 3 or 4 S’s, then we identify the tendency to be a streak and we bet accordingly.

Example 3 below will clarify the above concept and how we go back to B and P decisions to bet accordingly:

Since we had 3 chops (C’s) versus 1 streak (S) at hands 5-8, we identify the tendency to be a C or a chop. That means that only now we are ready to place a bet and that the first 8 decisions of a shoe are there to form the proper groupings, if you are just starting to play. When the game progresses and if you haven’t completed an IBS4 run, you will continue it to the next shoe.

Now, let’s see what it means to have a C or a chop tendency in decision 8. That means, that we’re expecting a chop from a U (unequal case) to an E (equal case), since we had a U at hand 8. Looking back at the actual P and B decisions, this also means, that now we are expecting an equal number of B’s versus P’s or overall B’s or P’s for the last 4 decisions. Since we had P B B at hands 6-8, in order for an Equal case to happen we need a P. This way we will have 2 P’s and 2 B’s. If the next decision would be a B, then we would have 3 B’s and 1 P. That would have been an Unequal case. So we bet on P at hand 9. Indeed a P comes up and we win that bet.

Let’s see what happens next. The last 4 decisions at hands 6-9 are now: P B B P. This is an Equal case, so we write E under the Equal/Unequal column. Looking at the last 2 cases of this column we see that U chopped to E. So we write a C (chop) under Streak Chop column. Now, we look at the last 4 entries at Streak Chop column to identify a tendency. We see three C’s and one S. Obviously the tendency is still a C. We write a C under the Tendency column and this determines again our next bet.

This may seem a bit complicated at first, but once you practice it, you will get the feel of it and the process will be quite fast to determine your next bet.

For now, simply follow Example 3 and study it thoroughly and then practice it with some random decisions, or look at the attachment provided to you with 40,000 Zumma or random decisions. In cell O2, if you write Zumma, the spreadsheet will turn into the Zumma tester book decisions and if you write Random, you will receive 40,000 random decisions, which you can change by merely pressing F9 to get another set of 40,000 random decisions indefinitely. The IBS4 bet method part is provided for the Zumma tester book decisions only.

Coming back to the explanation of Example 3, let’s see again what it means to have written a C under the Tendency column at hand 9. We immediately look at the U and E cases of hand 9. Since we have an E under column Equal Unequal, because of the Chop tendency, we expect now the E to chop or to change to U at hand 10. Since we have B B P at hands 7-9 and Unequal case would be if we get another B, because if we get a P, we will have an equal number of B’s and P’s. So we bet for a B to come up at hand 10, which would mean 3 B’s versus 1 P or Unequal case.

We bet B at hand 10, but a P shows up, making our case an Equal case instead and we lose our bet. We quickly register E under Equal Unequal column. E streaks to E (two consecutive E’s at hands 9 and 10), so we register S under Chop and Streak column. Look at the last 4 entries for C’s and S’s and we find still three C’s and one S, thus the tendency remains still a C or a chop for E and U.

Chop means that we expect the E to turn to a U at hand 11. And we bet P for an unequal case (to get 3 P’s versus 1 B), But a B comes up and we lose our bet. A “B” at hand 11 forms the last 4 decisions to be B P P B, which is an Equal case. We write E and we notice the last 2 are both E, that means a S(treak) for the next layer. Looking at the last 4 entries, hands 8-11, we now have 2 C’s and 2S’s. Since their number is the same, we cannot determine any tendency and we place no bets at hand 12. We write “No Bet” under Tendency and we skip a bet at hand 12.

Please note that when we write a “C”, “S” or “No Bet” under column Tendency, this is meant for the next bet.

Now that we got a good feel for the bet selection, let’s see how fast we can determine our next bet:

A “B” comes up at hand 12. The last 4 decisions are now P P B B. This is an Equal case. The last 2 entries are both E’s, so this is a Streak. The last 4 under Tendency is 3 S’s and one C’s, so it’s an S. We look for a streak in E, and we bet P for an equal case at hand 13 and we win.

The above small paragraph summarizes how we go about the bet selection, for which you will develop some mechanics only by practicing as much as you can.

What is the logic behind this bet selection? Should the P and B decisions streak, we will be under sequences of Equal cases, which will streak in themselves identifying this tendency. Should the P and B decisions alternate, we will be also under multiple Equal case situations, showing the same streak and tendency. Should the P and B decisions come in the 2-2 patterns PP BB PP BB, etc., we will be also under Equal case streaks, as in the last 4 decisions we will always have 2 P’s and 2 B’s, and that will also show a streak in Equal cases and again the same tendency. So, all those patterns are captured automatically by a simple tendency identification.

Should the Player/Banker decisions come in random fashion, we will have lots of unequal cases, which may determine also a streak of Unequal cases and thus such a tendency.

And lastly, we will see chops of Equal and Unequal cases, which will determine a C tendency. And in the case of total chaos of decisions, and we cannot determine any tendency we simply stop betting.

This kind of grouping causes many consecutive winning sequences, as illustrated in Example 4 below (an extract of Zumma decisions – full details are in the attached spreadsheet), where we will soon see how IBS4 will take full advantage of them.

Therefore, even if the B P decisions form a certain pattern, which is very hard to detect with an empty eye, this kind of grouping will identify a proper tendency, as we can see in Example 4 above. A very powerful bet selection indeed and one of its kind.

Now, we’re ready for the very strong bet method to be used in conjunction with the above bet selection. For now, in order to explain just the bet method, we will refer to only the win/lose results generated by the bet selection. And finally, we will provide a full example combining the bet selection and the bet method.

As much as the bet selection is a mechanical one, at times, there will be some flexibility allowed for the player to take a certain decision, based on his/her budget, the amount of highest bet one is ready to make, etc. In order to avoid any kind of confusion or making guesses, we will identify sets of guidelines on how to take the proper decision. Within those sets of guidelines, the system will remain totally mechanical.

The bet method is a highly enhanced and modified cancellation system. You may be acquainted with the classic cancellation system called LaBouchere and may find some similarities, and it may help you understand IBS4 better, but you will find IBS4 has a unique approach. LaBouchere always bets on the sum of two numbers on your betting scheme and IBS4 expands and contracts based on what goes on at the tables.

There will be a set of rules that we need to apply for IBS4 bet method.

The IBS4 betting scheme is defined by the figures we write on a template based on our winning and losing amounts. The moment we are able to write off or cancel all the figures on our scheme we know that we have won the run with a profit. A run is defined by a set of decisions with wins and losses, at the end of which we end up with 1 unit profit, the moment it is terminated successfully.

We start by betting 1 unit and if we win our very first bet, it is already a completed run and we profit 1 unit. We will designate each winning run by writing “End of run” to our betting scheme.

Thus, here is the shortest run ever:

W/L IBS4 Scheme Units Net Units
W End of run 1 1

We will also keep track on the number of units we win under Units and the total cumulative profit or net balance overall under Net Units. All examples will be taken from the 40,000 Zumma tester book decisions. At first, the units are whole numbers, as they do not take into account the Banker win commissions in Baccarat. However, we will see later on, how to handle commissions in such a way, that an “End of run” will still end with a 1 whole unit profit.

So, let’s see what happens if we lose some of our bets.

If we lose the first bet of our run, we register it by writing:

W/L IBS4 Scheme
L 1 1

L under the column W/L and 1 1 under IBS4 scheme.

Why 1 1 and not just 1? Because the first “1” identifies how much we would like to profit at the end of the run and the second “1” is the 1 unit we just lost. By registering those numbers this way and by canceling them all at the end of the run, this will mean that we have eliminated all our losses and have won 1 unit at the end of the run.

Here is one rule for IBS4 bet method: After a loss, any loss, at any stage of the run, we always bet 1 unit, no matter how much we are up or down during the run. This is a major difference from the previous versions of IBS, where after a loss one could bet lots of units.
IBS4 finds it reasonable that if we are going to go through many consecutive losses, there is no point of betting more than 1 unit (or even not at all if the table allows, but most tables require you to place a bet, when you are seated) with the only price, that we may need an extra win or two at the end of the run in order to close it with a profit.

So taking this rule into consideration, here is what happens at the end of the sequence of some consecutive losses:

W/L IBS4 Scheme
L 1 1
L 1 1 1
No Bet
L 1 1 1 1
L 1 1 1 1 1
No Bet
L 1 1 1 1 1 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
No Bet
No Bet
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
No Bet
W 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

The “No Bet”s are the results of the bet selection, which are of course totally ignored, since we were not placing any bets. So, you can see how we register the 1 unit we lose after each loss. And if we win our bet at the end of that losing sequence, we have just cancelled the 1 unit we have bet. That’s why, at a winning bet, you have one number less than the previous bet on the IBS4 Scheme.

Seven consecutive losses cause the writing of 8 figures of 1 in the IBS4 scheme. Why 8 and not 7? Well, always remember the very 1 unit we would like to profit at the end of the run.

Theoretically and practically, we could want to win more than 1 unit at the end of the run, say 2 or 3 units or 5 units. Then we would be writing L 1 5 after the first loss and L 1 1 5 after the second loss (remember the losing 1 units are registered from the left), etc., but this may eventually escalate our bets, when the run progresses. So for the sake of this document we will limit the profit we will make at the end of the run to just 1 unit. When you gain experience with the system and have an increased budget, you may want to increase your run profit goal accordingly but please avoid greed, as it is the main ingredient for failure.

After a few losing bets, it is normal to expect a win. We cannot lose forever, can we, particularly not with our strong bet selection?

Here is when it becomes interesting and one of the main features and rules of IBS4: After a win, any win during the run, we look back to our bets for that run and count the number of consecutive losses we had so far. In our last sequence, we count 7, that is, we had 7 consecutive losses prior to our win. This means, that for our next bet, we will be the sum of 7 figures of our IBS4 betting scheme, starting from the right end. We will soon see and know why from the right. IBS3 was betting from the left end. This is another major difference and you will soon see how this improves the system greatly.

Since up to now we had a bunch of 1’s, counting 7 figures from left or right doesn’t matter for now.

We will also see how this rule will vary depending on circumstances in more complex runs. We will go step by step, not to cause any confusion. The rules and the logic will be clearer once we get deeper into more intricate runs, where wins and losses happen in various different stages. Our main goal is to keep our bets as low as possible and still win the runs with the 1 unit profit goal we have set.

After all, you own the best system in the market and winning in gambling is not a piece of cake. You are struggling with table limits and competing against an unlimited casino bankroll. But if you comprehend how IBS4 is built for such conditions, you will feel proud to have such a system, which was the result of many years of research. Well, I am surely proud, in any event, and this is my best system so far (at least until IBS5 may be developed in the future, presenting something even better – remember there is no limit in improvement). This feeling is quite justified and I’m confident you will share it when you complete reading this document and perform your tests.

So we are betting now, after our win, on the sum of the 7 figures of our IBS4 scheme from the right, betting 7 units. And if we win our next bet, too, we have eliminated or cancelled all figures on this scheme and it will be “End of run” with a profit:

W/L IBS4 Scheme Units Net Units
W End of run 1 1
L 1 1 0 1
L 1 1 1 0 1
No Bet 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
No Bet 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
No Bet 0 1
No Bet 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
No Bet 0 1
W 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
W End of run 1 2

Not bad! We had 3 wins versus 7 losses and we are ahead by 2 units, having bet not more than 7 units tops and only 1 unit after each loss. It would be nice if life would be that rosy, but it isn’t. Let’s make our lives more complicated, as it is in real life, and let’s make the run a bit more challenging. Let’s say, we don’t win the second time, but we lose our bet of 7 units. What do we do? Yes, we register those lost 7 units and append it to the IBS4 Scheme from the right, as shown below:

W/L IBS4 Scheme Units Net Units
W End of run 1 1
L 1 1 0 1
L 1 1 1 0 1
No Bet 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
No Bet 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
No Bet 0 1
No Bet 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
No Bet 0 1
W 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 0 1

How much do we bet after this last loss? Don’t think too hard: always 1 unit. After every loss, we bet 1 unit only. That means that if we win our next bet, we would be canceling the 1 unit we bet and erasing it from the scheme from the left.

W/L IBS4 Scheme Units Net Units
W End of run 1 1
L 1 1 0 1
L 1 1 1 0 1
No Bet 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
No Bet 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
No Bet 0 1
No Bet 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
No Bet 0 1
W 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 0 1
W 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 0 1

Here comes another important and interesting rule for the IBS4 bet method. I wonder if you noticed, but we have cancelled the 1 unit we won from the left and registered the 7 units we lost on the right end of the our IBS4 scheme. We will always do so. If we lose 1 unit after a loss, we will register it from the left end side of our scheme and if we lose a bet after a win, we will write it from the right end of our scheme. Why is that? This keeps things in perspective. We start registering our losses and see them being appended on the right and keep our small losses of 1 unit registered on the left.

Eventually you will see how we start betting from the right side and from the left side and as a combination of right and left in order to adjust the size of our bets. There will be specific rules for that, as well, to keep the system straightforward.

For now, just keep in mind that losses of 1 unit are registered from the left end and losses after a win are registered from the right end. And bets after a win are the sum of the number of consecutive losses starting from the right, which is now the case after our last win.

As we progress with the system, we will be identifying extra rules. Here is another one: the number of consecutive losses is the maximum number of consecutive losses encountered during a specific run. For instance, if you have the sequence L L L L L L L W L L L L W L L W, at first we have 7 consecutive losses until the first win, then 4 consecutive losses until the second win, then 2. The maximum number of consecutive losses is 7 and we remain in this mode, to which we will refer as 7-way cancellation mode.

In 7-way cancellation mode, we will bet on the sum of 7 figures on our scheme from the right side. In 4-way cancellation mode, we will bet on the sum of 4 figures on our scheme from the right, etc.

If we have first 4 consecutive losses followed by a win, and then 7 consecutive losses followed by a win, we switch from 4-way cancellation mode to 7-way cancellation mode and remain within this maximum even if we have less consecutive losses after any win within the run. However, if we have first 7 consecutive losses followed by a win, and 4 consecutive losses followed by a win, we don’t switch to 4 way cancellation mode from 7, but remain in the maximum 7. This is another very important rule to remember: that we stay at the maximum number of cancellation modes within the run based on the maximum number of consecutive losses. And also please note that those losses have to be consecutive, that is, one after another, in a row. If we have a sequence of the nature L L W L L L W L W L L W L W W L W, you do not count the total number of losses, which is 10, but the number of losses in a row between wins, that is, 2, then 3, then 1, then 2, etc. 3 being the maximum, we remain in 3 way cancellation mode throughout the run, until it’s over.

1-way or 2-way cancellation modes are totally valid. If you have a sequence of the nature L W L W L, etc. you are in 1-way cancellation mode and you bet on the only number left on the scheme after your first win. (L 1 1, W 1, L 1 1, W 1, etc.). In 2-way cancellation mode, that means you had two consecutive losses and you bet on the sum of two figures in your scheme, etc.

You will see that you will get a feel of that also quite fast. For more complex runs, you will need a pad and pen to write all this down.

After our last win, we have:

W 1 1 1 1 1 1 7

And since we won, and we are in 7-way cancellation mode, we bet on the sum of the 7 figures on our scheme starting from the right, that is on 7+1+1+1+1+1+1 = 13 units, which is really all the figures on our scheme. And because it’s all the figures, it will take one more win to complete the run with the 1 unit profit and this is indeed what exactly happens:

W/L IBS4 Scheme Units Net Units
W End of run 1 1
L 1 1 0 1
L 1 1 1 0 1
No Bet 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
No Bet 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
No Bet 0 1
No Bet 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
No Bet 0 1
W 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 0 1
W 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 0 1
W End of run 1 2

This is what happens where? Well, this is an example taken straight from Zumma, being the very first few decisions. Below, in Example 5, is the complete illustration, including the bet selection we discussed before:

Example 5:

Shoe Hand Decision Equal Unequal Streak Chop Tendency Bet on W/L IBS4 Scheme Units Net Units
1 1 B
1 2 B
1 3 B
1 4 B E
1 5 P U C
1 6 B U S
1 7 B U S
1 8 B U S S
1 9 P U S S P W End of run 1 1
1 10 P E C S B L 1 1 0 1
1 11 P U C No Bet B L 1 1 1 0 1
1 12 P E C C No Bet No Bet 0 1
1 13 P E S C B L 1 1 1 1 0 1
1 14 P E S No Bet B L 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
1 15 P E S S No Bet No Bet 0 1
1 16 B U C S P L 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
1 17 B E C No Bet P L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
1 18 P E S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 1
1 19 B U C C No Bet No Bet 0 1
1 20 B U S No Bet P L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
1 21 B U S S No Bet No Bet 0 1
1 22 P U S S P W 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
1 23 P E C S B L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 0 1
1 24 B E S S B W 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 0 1
1 25 B E S S B W End of run 1 2

Even Zumma starts simple, but, of course, never remains simple. We will now start discussing more complex runs, in order for you to fully understand how the system works and we will add more rules.

By the way, more rules are not added because of what happens in Zumma. That would have been reverse engineering. Those rules were set beforehand. We’re just explaining them as runs gets more and more complex.

We will go deeper into the Zumma tester book and look for more intricate runs and explain how the system works. Here is one in Example 6 below, which is really the continuation of Example 5, from the point we were left, that is, from Shoe 1, Hand 26.

Example 6:

Shoe Hand Decision Equal Unequal Streak Chop Tendency Bet on W/L IBS4 Scheme Units Net Units
1 26 B U C No Bet P L 1 1 0 2
1 27 B E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 2
1 28 P U C C No Bet No Bet 0 2
1 29 B U S C P L 1 1 1 0 2
1 30 P E C C P W 1 1 0 2
1 31 P U C C P W End of run 1 3
1 32 P U S No Bet B L 1 1 0 3
1 33 B U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 3
1 34 B E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 3
1 35 B U C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 3
1 36 B E C C No Bet No Bet 0 3
1 37 P U C C P W 1 0 3
1 38 P E C C P W End of run 1 4
1 39 B E S C P L 1 1 0 4
1 40 B E S No Bet P L 1 1 1 0 4
1 41 P E S S No Bet No Bet 0 4
1 42 B U C S P L 1 1 1 1 0 4
1 43 B U S S B W 1 1 1 0 4
1 44 P E C No Bet B L 1 1 1 3 0 4
1 45 P E S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 4
1 46 P U C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 4
1 47 P E C C No Bet No Bet 0 4
1 48 P E S No Bet B L 1 1 1 1 3 0 4
1 49 B U C C No Bet No Bet 0 4
1 50 B E C C B W 1 1 1 3 0 4
1 51 B U C C B W 1 0 4
1 52 P U S C B L 1 1 0 4
1 53 B U S No Bet P L 1 1 1 0 4
1 54 P E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 4
1 55 P U C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 4
1 56 P U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 4
1 57 B U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 4
1 58 B E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 4
1 59 B U C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 4
1 60 P U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 4
1 61 B U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 4
1 62 B U S S No Bet No Bet 0 4
1 63 P E C S B L 1 1 1 1 0 4
1 64 P E S S P W 1 1 1 0 4
1 65 P U C No Bet B L 1 1 1 3 0 4
1 66 P E C C No Bet No Bet 0 4
1 67 B U C C B W 1 1 3 0 4
1 68 P U S C B L 1 1 3 5 0 4
1 69 B E C C B W 1 3 5 0 4
1 70 B U C C B W End of run 1 5
1 71 B U S No Bet P L 1 1 0 5
2 1 P U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 5
2 2 P E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 5
2 3 P U C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 5
2 4 B U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 5
2 5 P U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 5
2 6 B E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 5
2 7 P E S S No Bet No Bet 0 5
2 8 P U C No Bet B L 1 1 1 0 5
2 9 B E C C No Bet No Bet 0 5
2 10 P U C C P W 1 1 0 5
2 11 B E C C B W End of run 1 6
2 12 P E S C B L 1 1 0 6
2 13 B E S No Bet P L 1 1 1 0 6
2 14 P E S S No Bet No Bet 0 6
2 15 B E S S B W 1 1 0 6
2 16 B U C S P L 1 1 2 0 6
2 17 B U S S B W 1 2 0 6
2 18 P U S S P W End of run 1 7
2 19 B U S S B W End of run 1 8
2 20 B U S S B W End of run 1 9
2 21 B U S S B W End of run 1 10
2 22 B E C S P L 1 1 0 10
2 23 P U C No Bet B L 1 1 1 0 10
2 24 P E C C No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 25 P U C C P W 1 1 0 10
2 26 B U S C P L 1 1 2 0 10
2 27 P U S No Bet B L 1 1 1 2 0 10
2 28 B E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 29 B U C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 30 B U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 31 P U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 32 P E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 33 B E S S No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 34 P U C No Bet B L 1 1 1 1 2 0 10
2 35 P U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 36 B E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 37 B E S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 38 P E S S No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 39 B U C No Bet P L 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 10
2 40 P E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 41 B E S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 42 B U C C No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 43 P E C C P W 1 1 1 1 2 0 10
2 44 P E S No Bet B L 1 1 1 1 2 5 0 10
2 45 B E S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 46 B E S S No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 47 P E S S P W 1 1 1 2 5 0 10
2 48 B U C S P L 1 1 1 2 5 9 0 10
2 49 B U S S B W 1 1 2 5 9 0 10
2 50 P E C No Bet B L 1 1 2 5 9 17 0 10
2 51 P E S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 52 B E S S No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 53 P U C No Bet B L 1 1 1 2 5 9 17 0 10
2 54 B E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 55 B U C C No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 56 P E C C P W 1 1 2 5 9 17 0 10
2 57 P E S C B L 1 1 2 5 9 17 33 0 10
2 58 B E S No Bet P L 1 1 1 2 5 9 17 33 0 10
2 59 P U C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 60 B E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 61 B U C C No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 62 P E C C P W 1 1 2 5 9 17 33 0 10
2 63 B U C C B W 1 1 2 0 10
2 64 B U S C P L 1 1 2 4 0 10
2 65 P E C C P W 1 2 4 0 10
2 66 P E S No Bet B L 1 2 4 7 0 10
2 67 B E S S No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 68 B E S S B W 2 4 7 0 10
2 69 B U C S P L 2 4 7 13 0 10
2 70 B E C No Bet P L 1 2 4 7 13 0 10
2 71 P U C C No Bet No Bet 0 10
2 72 B U S C P L 1 1 2 4 7 13 0 10
3 1 B U S No Bet P L 1 1 1 2 4 7 13 0 10
3 2 B U S S No Bet No Bet 0 10
3 3 P U S S P W 1 1 2 4 7 13 0 10
3 4 B U S S B W 1 1 0 10
3 5 P E C S B L 1 1 2 0 10
3 6 B E S S B W 1 2 0 10
3 7 B U C No Bet P L 1 2 3 0 10
3 8 B U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
3 9 B E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 10
3 10 P U C C No Bet No Bet 0 10
3 11 P E C C P W 2 3 0 10
3 12 B E S C P L 2 3 5 0 10
3 13 B E S No Bet P L 1 2 3 5 0 10
3 14 P E S S No Bet No Bet 0 10
3 15 B U C S P L 1 1 2 3 5 0 10
3 16 P E C No Bet B L 1 1 1 2 3 5 0 10
3 17 P U C C No Bet No Bet 0 10
3 18 B E C C B W 1 1 2 3 5 0 10
3 19 P U C C P W 1 0 10
3 20 B E C C B W End of run 1 11

Two consecutive losses at Shoe 1, Hands 26-29 places us at 2-way cancellation mode after the win at Hand 30. Since we have W 1 1 in our scheme at Hand 30 and because of the 2-way cancellation mode, we bet on the sum of 2 numbers of the scheme, that is 1+1 or 2 units. We win the bet at Hand 31 and that completes the run with 1 unit profit.

Let’s go further down. At Shoe 1, Hands 39-42, we have 3 consecutive losses prior to the win at Hand 43, so we’re in 3-way cancellation mode. We bet on the sum of the 3 1’s, that is 3 units. We lose that bet. We register it at hand 44 as

L 1 1 1 3

After that we bet 1 unit, since we lost our bet.

After another loss at hand 49, we register the 1 unit loss from the left as:

L 1 1 1 1 3

Our win at hand 50, cancels this last loss:

W 1 1 1 3

Despite the fact that we had 2 consecutive losses at Shoe 1, Hands 44 – 48, we remain at 3-way cancellation mode, according to the rule of the maximum cancellation ways and we bet on the sum of the last 3 numbers in our scheme, that is 3+1+1 = 5 units. Our win at Hand 51 cancels those 3 figures and we are left with:

W 1

As you noticed, this double win did not complete the run, as it would have in IBS3, but we need much less bankroll now and a few extra wins to complete the run, which will come sooner than later.

And as shown below, the run comes to an end a bit at a later stage, during Shoe 1, Hands 53 to 70, having remained in 3-way cancellation mode, thus betting 5+3+1 = 9 units at the very last winning bet.

L 1 1
L 1 1 1
No Bet
No Bet
No Bet
No Bet
No Bet
No Bet
No Bet
No Bet
No Bet
L 1 1 1 1
W 1 1 1
L 1 1 1 3
No Bet
W 1 1 3
L 1 1 3 5
W 1 3 5
W End of run

Now, let’s take a run in Example 7 below, where we will apply a special betting technique in order to reduce the amount of our bets.

Example 7:

Shoe Hand Decision Equal Unequal Streak Chop Tendency Bet on W/L IBS4 Scheme Units Net Units
20 57 B E C S P L 1 1 0 193
20 58 P U C No Bet B L 1 1 1 0 193
20 59 B E C C No Bet No Bet 0 193
20 60 B U C C B W 1 1 0 193
20 61 B U S C P L 1 1 2 0 193
20 62 B E C C B W 1 2 0 193
20 63 B E S No Bet P L 1 2 3 0 193
20 64 P U C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 193
20 65 P E C C No Bet No Bet 0 193
20 66 P U C C P W 2 3 0 193
20 67 B U S C P L 2 3 5 0 193
20 68 P U S No Bet B L 1 2 3 5 0 193
21 1 P U S S No Bet No Bet 0 193
21 2 P U S S P W 2 3 5 0 193
21 3 P E C S B L 2 3 5 8 0 193
21 4 B U C No Bet P L 1 2 3 5 8 0 193
21 5 P U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 193
21 6 P U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 193
21 7 B E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 193
21 8 P U C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 193
21 9 B E C C No Bet No Bet 0 193
21 10 P E S C B L 1 1 2 3 5 8 0 193
21 11 B E S No Bet P L 1 1 1 2 3 5 8 0 193
21 12 P E S S No Bet No Bet 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 8 0 193
21 13 P U C S B L 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 8 0 193
21 14 P U S S P W 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 8 0 193
21 15 P E C No Bet B L 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 8 19 0 193
21 16 B U C C No Bet No Bet 0 193
21 17 P U S No Bet B L 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 8 19 0 193
21 18 B E C C No Bet No Bet 0 193
21 19 B U C C B W 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 8 19 0 193
21 20 B U S No Bet P L 1 1 1 1 2 3 5 8 19 37 0 193
21 21 B E C C No Bet No Bet 0 193
21 22 P U C C P W 1 1 1 2 3 5 8 19 37 0 193
21 23 P E C C P W 1 1 1 2 0 193
21 24 P U C C P W End of run 1 194

We specified before, that we would like to try to keep the bets as low as possible. We have been so far accumulating the losses after our wins and appending them from the right side of our scheme. If those figures are not too large, betting on their sum from the right after a win, cancels the larger losses in advance and leaves us with small figures on our scheme. However, if those bets start escalating, then we take action and we don’t bet on the sum of those from the right side only, but we start moderating.

There are a few techniques for such a moderation. In one of them, that we will see in Example 7 above, we will be taking one large figure from the right side and merge it with the smaller figures from the left.

Presently, Example 7 is illustrated the way we have seen so far, that is, betting on the figures from the right side only, particularly in the case of Shoe 21, Hand 22 above. We are at 5-way cancellation mode, due to the 5 consecutive losses of Hands 3 to 13 of Zumma Shoe 21. Our scheme is:

W 1 1 1 2 3 5 8 19 37

after our win at Hand 22. Since we are at 5-way cancellation mode, our next bet should have been: 37+19+8+5+3 = 72 units. According to the present illustration, we win that bet and we are left with

W 1 1 1 2

And the win after that cancels all figures and ends the run.

Let’s say our budget does not allow us to place a 72 unit bet. Therefore, what we do is the following. We take only one figure from the rightmost entry of our scheme, that is the 37 units and we take 4 figures from the smaller amounts on the left side, that is 1+1+1+2 = 5 and we place a 37 + 5 = 42 unit instead of 72.

Winning the bet at Hand 23, makes our scheme:

W 3 5 8 19

having cancelled the 1 1 1 2 from the left side and the 37 from the right side.

Now, we bet on the sum of the remaining figures: 3+5+8+19 = 35 units, we win that bet and end our run.

This is a technique that will be used every time the bets from the right side start escalating to a higher figure than what our budget allows.

At times, when the game progresses, particularly when wins and losses start chopping, you will find that figures on your IBS4 scheme will tend to go larger on the right side, but no longer necessarily forms a sequence of 1’s on the left. You will still have smaller figures from the left side, nevertheless, because of the way we write the figures on the scheme: a loss after a win to the right side and a 1 unit loss from the left side. And if we win the bet after the loss, we cancel that 1 unit from the left.

Therefore, for the above cases, we will use a different special technique. When bets start escalating and the figures from the left are relatively smaller than the right side of the scheme, we will bet the sum of the figures from the left side instead of from the right.

This is best illustrated in Example 8 below:

Example 8:

Shoe Hand Decision Equal Unequal Streak Chop Tendency Bet on W/L IBS4 Scheme Units Net Units
50 22 P E S C B L 1 1 0 524
50 23 B E S No Bet P L 1 1 1 0 524
50 24 P U C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 524
50 25 B E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 524
50 26 B U C C No Bet No Bet 0 524
50 27 B U S C P L 1 1 1 1 0 524
50 28 B E C C B W 1 1 1 0 524
50 29 B E S No Bet P L 1 1 1 3 0 524
50 30 B E S S No Bet No Bet 0 524
50 31 P U C No Bet B L 1 1 1 1 3 0 524
50 32 P E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 524
50 33 P U C C No Bet No Bet 0 524
50 34 P E C C P W 1 1 1 3 0 524
50 35 P E S C B L 1 1 1 3 5 0 524
50 36 P E S No Bet B L 1 1 1 1 3 5 0 524
50 37 B U C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 524
50 38 B E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 524
50 39 B U C C No Bet No Bet 0 524
50 40 B E C C B W 1 1 1 3 5 0 524
50 41 B E S C P L 1 1 1 3 5 9 0 524
50 42 P U C C P W 1 1 3 5 9 0 524
50 43 B U S No Bet P L 1 1 3 5 9 17 0 524
50 44 B U S S No Bet No Bet 0 524
50 45 B U S S B W 1 3 5 9 17 0 524
50 46 B E C S P L 1 3 5 9 17 31 0 524
50 47 P U C No Bet B L 1 1 3 5 9 17 31 0 524
50 48 B U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 524
50 49 P E C C No Bet No Bet 0 524
50 50 P U C C P W 1 3 5 9 17 31 0 524
50 51 P U S No Bet B L 1 3 5 9 17 31 57 0 524
50 52 P E C C No Bet No Bet 0 524
50 53 B U C C B W 3 5 9 17 31 57 0 524
50 54 B E C C B W 3 5 9 0 524
50 55 B U C C B W End of run 1 525

We are in 3-way cancellation mode, due to the 3 consecutive losses that have occurred at Shoe 50, Hands 22-27. As the wins and losses are choppy during Hands 29-50, we have the scheme:

W 1 3 5 9 17 31

at Shoe 50, Hand 50. Our next bet should have required the betting of 31+17+9 = 57 units as illustrated in Example 8 above, which is the normal and regular betting way of IBS4. However, if we bet this time from the left side instead, from Hand 50 on, our bet is reduced to: 1+3+5 = 9 units instead or 57, and if we win our next bet, we still cancel 3 figures of our scheme towards the “End of run”. So why not do so?

Then the final stage of the run looks like the following:

50 51 P U S No Bet B L 1 3 5 9 17 31 9 0 524
50 52 P E C C No Bet No Bet 0 524
50 53 B U C C B W 3 5 9 17 31 9 0 524
50 54 B E C C B W 17 31 9 0 524
50 55 B U C C B W End of run 1 525

At Hand 54, we only have 3 numbers, so it really doesn’t matter if we bet from the left or right side. The run is over the same way, but we needed overall much less session bankroll to end it.

As you gain experience with the system and as you observe the figures on your scheme, you will make the right decisions of betting either from the right side only, or one large figure from the right combined with some from the left or from the left side only.

The following three paragraphs are your guidelines in the decision making process:

Iif you have a bunch of 1’s on the left and just a couple of larger figures on the right side of the IBS4 scheme, you bet from the right side only.

If you have some small figures on the left and mostly 1’s and bets start escalating higher and higher on the right, then you bet one large figure from the right side and as many required from the left side, depending on which cancellation mode you’re in.

If you have a certain balance between left side and the right side and the figures on the right side are only larger to a certain degree than from the left side, then you switch to betting from the left side of your scheme only.

Following is a typical and an intricate IBS4 run at Example 9 below, which illustrates best the switching of cancellation modes and the use of special betting techniques.

Example 9:

Shoe Hand Decision Equal Unequal Streak Chop Tendency Bet on W/L IBS4 Scheme Units Net Units
163 38 B U C S P L 1 1 0 1564
163 39 P E C No Bet B L 1 1 1 0 1564
163 40 P U C C No Bet No Bet 0 1564
163 41 P U S C B L 1 1 1 1 0 1564
163 42 P E C C P W 1 1 1 0 1564
163 43 P E S No Bet B L 1 1 1 3 0 1564
163 44 P E S S No Bet No Bet 0 1564
163 45 P E S S P W 1 1 3 0 1564
163 46 B U C S P L 1 1 3 5 0 1564
163 47 P U S S P W 1 3 5 0 1564
163 48 B E C No Bet P L 1 3 5 9 0 1564
163 49 B U C C No Bet No Bet 0 1564
163 50 B U S No Bet P L 1 1 3 5 9 0 1564
163 51 P U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 1564
163 52 B U S S No Bet No Bet 0 1564
163 53 P E C S B L 1 1 1 3 5 9 0 1564
163 54 P U C No Bet B L 1 1 1 1 3 5 9 0 1564
163 55 B E C C No Bet No Bet 0 1564
163 56 P U C C P W 1 1 1 3 5 9 0 1564
163 57 P U S C B L 1 1 1 3 5 9 18 0 1564
163 58 P U S No Bet B L 1 1 1 1 3 5 9 18 0 1564
163 59 B U S S No Bet No Bet 0 1564
163 60 B E C S P L 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 9 18 0 1564
163 61 B U C No Bet P L 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 9 18 0 1564
163 62 B E C C No Bet No Bet 0 1564
163 63 B E S C P L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 9 18 0 1564
163 64 P U C C P W 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 9 18 0 1564
163 65 B U S No Bet P L 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 9 18 36 0 1564
163 66 P E C No Bet No Bet No Bet 0 1564
163 67 P U C C No Bet No Bet 0 1564
163 68 P U S No Bet B L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 9 18 36 0 1564
163 69 P E C C No Bet No Bet 0 1564
163 70 B U C C B W 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 9 18 36 0 1564
163 71 B E C C B W 1 1 3 5 9 18 0 1564
164 1 B U C C B W 1 0 1564
164 2 B E C C B W End of run 1 1565

A new run starts at Shoe 163, Hand 39. We start with 3 consecutive losses at Hands 38-41, and after the win at Hand 42, we are in 3-way cancellation mode. We bet on the sum of the only 3 figures 1+1+1 = 3 units at Hand 43. We lose that bet and register or append the lost 3 units to the end of the scheme from the right. .

At Hand 45, we win the 1 unit we were betting after our loss of Hand 43 and erase it from the left. We are still in 3-way cancellation mode and bet on the sum of the only 3 figures on our scheme: 1+1+3 = 5 and we lose that bet at Hand 46. We append the lost 5 units to the scheme from the right..

Being still in 3-way cancellation mode, we bet again the sum of the only 3 figures on our scheme: 1+3+5 = 9 units. We lose that bet at Hand 50. We register the 9 to the right. After our loss, we bet only 1 unit (always). We lose our 1 unit bets at Hands 50, 53 and 54. Then we win the last 1 unit we bet at Hand 56. Now, we look back and see that we have 4 consecutive losses that occurred at Hands 48-54, thus we switch to 4-way cancellation mode. From now on, we will bet on the sum of 4 figures on our scheme – whether from left or right will depend on how high the figures become and how much we are willing to bet according to our budget.

Considering the fact that the figures are not that high yet, we bet the sum of the last 4 figures on our scheme (from the right) 9+5+3+1 = 18. We lose that bet at Hand 57 and we bet 1 unit again at Hand 58. We lose our 1 unit bets all the way to Hand 64, where the win cancels the last 1 unit bet. Now, we see that we have 5 consecutive losses that occurred recently at Hands 57-63. So, we immediately switch to 5-way cancellation mode, that is, we will from now on bet on the sum of 5 figures on our scheme.

Figures still being not too high, we bet 18+9+5+3+1 = 36 units on our next bet at Hand 65 and we lose that bet, too, registering 36 from the right of the scheme. After this loss, we bet only 1 unit, that we also lose at Hand 68.

At Hand 70, we win our 1 unit bet and erase it from the left. Now, we have:

W 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 9 18 36

on our scheme. Betting from the right would escalate the bets a bit too high. Not all of us have a budget to bet 36+18+9+5+3 = 71 units. So, we use the special technique of having 1 relatively larger figure from the right, that is, the 36 and four figures from the left, since we are in 5-way cancellation mode. So, we bet 36+1+1+1+1 = 40 units at Hand 71. We win that bet and cancel those figures we have just bet, leaving us with a scheme:

W 1 1 3 5 9 18

Now, it’s less of a problem betting from the right side only. Thus we bet 18+9+5+3+1 = 36 units on our next bet. We win it at Shoe 164, Hand 1 (bets go from one Shoe to another), canceling all the figures we have bet. So, now we have only a “1” unit left to bet for.

We win that last bet of the run and cancel all figures, thus we gain 1 unit profit for that run, bringing our overall net balance to +1565 units by Shoe 164.

As you can see, our average win rate of 9.6 units per shoe has been maintained quite consistently throughout the entire time. The attached spreadsheet goes all the way to Shoe 178, Hand 42 or about 12,200 Zumma decisions generating +1696 units. The remaining part of the spreadsheet is left for you to fill as an exercise, which will be an excellent practice before you play the system live and to raise your confidence level.

All this was without taking Banker win commissions into consideration. Now, we will demonstrate a method, which allows you to bet in such a way that eliminates the existence of commissions, thus profiting still 1 whole unit at the end of our runs.

This is performed very simply by betting a certain amount, which will return the desired amount to be profited on each Banker bet. Let’s say in our next bet, we wish to make 9 units and our bet goes on Banker. So, instead of betting 9 units, we will bet an additional amount, such that if the casino takes 5% commission on it, we will end up with the desired profit. Let’s say our unit consists of $20. So, instead of betting $180, we will bet $180 X 1.06 = $190. If we win the bet, we get $180, since 95% of $190 is slightly above $180, which we wish to earn. If we lose the bet, we simply register the $190 to the end of our scheme from the right.

Here is a concrete example showing $ figures for clarity. Our unit value is $100.

Example 10:

Shoe Hand Decision Equal Unequal Streak Chop Tendency Bet on W/L IBS4 Scheme Net Units
9 53 P U S No Bet B L $100 $106 61
9 54 P U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 61
9 55 B U S S No Bet No Bet 61
9 56 P U S S P W $106 61
9 57 B E C S P L $106 $106 61
9 58 B U C No Bet P L $106 $106 $106 61
9 59 B U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 61
9 60 B E C C No Bet No Bet 61
9 61 B E S No Bet P L $106 $106 $106 $106 61
9 62 B E S S No Bet No Bet 61
9 63 B E S S B W $106 $106 $106 61
9 64 P U C S B L $106 $106 $106 $337 61
9 65 B U S S B W $106 $106 $337 61
9 66 P E C No Bet B L $106 $106 $337 $580 61
9 67 B E S No Bet No Bet No Bet 61
9 68 B U C No Bet No Bet No Bet 61
9 69 B U S No Bet No Bet No Bet 61
9 70 P U S S No Bet No Bet 61
9 71 B U S S B W $106 $337 $580 61
9 72 P E C S B L $106 $337 $580 $1080 61
9 73 P U C No Bet B L $112 $106 $337 $580 $1080 61
10 1 B E C C No Bet No Bet 61
10 2 B E S C P L $112 $112 $106 $337 $580 $1080 61
10 3 B U C C B W $112 $106 $337 $580 $1080 61
10 4 B E C C B W $112 $106 61
10 5 P U C C P W End of run 62